|
December 23, 2002
Attention: Messrs. Resnick and Davis,
I am writing this to
you not only as the secretary of the Shiloh Shepherd™ Dog Club of
America, Inc. but also on behalf of the scores of legitimate ISSR
Licensed Breeders who have produced between them over 360 litters of
Shiloh Shepherds™ and over 3000 Shiloh
Shepherd™
puppies, registered in the ISSR, Inc., the original Shiloh
Shepherd™
registry. (Indeed, the Shiloh Shepherd™ Dog Club of America, Inc., noted
in your article as the national breed club, is the parent club of the ISSR.)
Thank you for your
recent article on the Shiloh Shepherd™ breed. While we were honored to
appear in your magazine, there are several points that we feel needed to
be clarified.
The primary breeding
goals of ISSR breeders are:
- Superior
intelligence
- Stable
temperaments
- Large size
- Good hips
along with sound
health in all aspects. ISSR breeders are encouraged to follow our five
star program by attaining OFA Certifications for hearts, hips and elbows
as well as earning conformation and working titles.
The article stated
that our breed’s two main problems are EPI and sub aortic stenosis (SAS).
However, the statistics from our recent Health Survey conducted under
the auspices of the national breed club (SSDCA) and registry (ISSR) and
analyzed by Dr. George A. Padgett indicates that the top 3 diseases of
our breed were:
-
Pano,
-
EPI
-
Bloat
This information is
readily available on our website; we did send your author a link to the
results of the survey. SAS was reported in only 1.4% of our dogs. The
SSDCA is fully aware that the two other people interviewed for your
article have had extremely serious problems with SAS within their
various registries, possibly due to their practice of over-inbreeding
with multiple puppies born within such litters having proven to be
affected.
Also of concern was
the statement “In
a nutshell the bloodline is an 'old'
German Shepherd Dog line crossed with the Alaskan Malamute.” This
statement can be very deceiving, since it implies that the Shiloh is an
equal mixture of GSD and Malamute. In reality, the specifically
designed outcross that the Breed Founder, Tina
Barber, used consisted of a combination that
included the Hobo (a type of GSD) line, a
special line of Giant Malamute, and a White GSD line, thus the “New
Blood” dog aka "MAW" only carried
approximately 25% "malamute" blood, and his direct offspring in the
early 90's only had 12.5% of the Giant Malamute blood in them.
Most of Shilohs of today, approximately 5-7
generations later, have an extremely small %
of the "MAW" heritage left in them, certainly a far cry from the
impression given in your article! Furthermore, your article did not
mention the Alt Deutcher Shaferhunde line that was blended in during the
late 90's nor the Berger Blanc Suisse (White Shepherd)
line that was recently introduced. These lines were investigated
extensively by the breed founder over a period of many years with
multiple generations of health and hip information collected on not only
the chosen outcross lines but also their littermates. Both are European
variations of the "old style GSD" that have also been recognized as
separate breeds, thus making up the gene pool
of the Shiloh Shepherd™ (presently still under development by the breed
founder) what it is today!
As a side note, I
would also like to mention that the "breeders" you interviewed do not
use these lines, but are instead breeding to American German Shepherd
dogs and issuing their own home made computer generated papers
proclaiming the offspring to be "Shiloh Shepherds™". By implying that
they are breeding Shiloh Shepherds™ you are doing a great disservice
not only to all of the honest ISSR breeders
that are following the strict protocol of the breed founder,
but to your readers as well.
You
do realize that these individuals are affiliated neither with the ISSR
nor with the national breed club, the SSDCA.
ISSR breeders feel your article is very misleading because you did not
specify that Ms. Schaefer and Ms. Richardson, both of whom were quoted
in the article and referred to as breeders of Shiloh Shepherds™, are now
breeding GSD/Shiloh mixes that would not qualify for registration in any
legitimate organization. Yet, your article failed to inform the public
of this, misleading them to believe that they could purchase ISSR
quality puppies from these individuals. They are not now, and have not
been, members of the national breed club for nearly 6 years and none of
their dogs are ISSR registered. Your article however implies
differently.
Tina and I both
provided you links to our Licensed Breeder page where you easily could
have contacted any of our over 50 respectable breeders from coast to
coast, some of who have earned awards through our national club and are
listed on our Shiloh heroes pages. Yet, none were interviewed for your
article. Although you did attempt calling me (leaving me a message with
no return phone number), you did not call back as promised, and neither
returned messages nor responded to the numerous e-mails I sent you as
the secretary of the national breed club, webmaster of the 3
club/registry affiliated websites, compiler of the data from our health
survey, and the breeder of 7 ISSR registered Shiloh Shepherd™ litters.
Many of the numerous smaller errors in the article could easily have
been corrected if we had seen it in advance, e.g., the incorrect mailing
and e-mail address for the national breed club, the incorrect
height/weight information, the juxtaposition of breeding Shilohs for
strong hearts with heart problems incorrectly being named as a major
concern, etc.
The Schaefer group
consists of a small handful of people attempting to mass produce puppies
that they insist upon calling Shiloh Shepherds™ in order to attain sales.
I encourage you to verify this via any website that documents their
activities. I can assure you that our websites (with
over 2000 images and pages) are updated
on an ongoing basis. I hope you visited them when investigating
your story.
Sincerely,
Karen
Ursel
Secretary
Shiloh Shepherd™ Dog Club of America, Inc. |